Welcome to My Site

If this is your first visit, welcome! This site is devoted to my life experiences as a Filipino-American who immigrated from the Philippines to the United States in 1960. I came to the US as a graduate student when I was 26 years old. I am now in my mid-80's and thanks God for his blessings, I have four successful and professional children and six grandchildren here in the US. My wife and I had been enjoying the snow bird lifestyle between US and Philippines after my retirement from USFDA in 2002. Macrine(RIP),Me and my oldest son are the Intellectual migrants. Were were born in the Philippines, came to the US in 1960 and later became US citizens in 1972. Some of the photos and videos in this site, I do not own. However, I have no intention on infringing on your copyrights. Cheers!

Monday, January 26, 2026

A Senior's Reflection on Moral Leadership in America

When Faith and Citizenship Converge: A Catholic Senior’s Reflection on Moral Leadership and America

 As a lifelong Roman Catholic and a senior citizen of this great nation, I have walked through many seasons of American life, wars and peace, prosperity and hardship, unity and division. But rarely have I witnessed such an extraordinary moment as the recent public appeal by three U.S. Catholic cardinals urging our government to renew its moral compass in foreign policy.

Cardinals Blase Cupich, Robert McElroy, and Joseph Tobin shepherds of some of our largest archdioceses spoke not as partisans, but as moral voices rooted in the teachings of Christ and the social doctrine of our Church. Their message wasn’t about politics; it was about principle about human dignity, peace, and the common good. 

The cardinals cited instances of U.S. policy that risk inflicting suffering rather than fostering peace from military actions abroad to slashed foreign aid. They reminded us that national interest and moral duty are not enemies, but partners in the pursuit of a just world. 

Why This Matters to Me

As someone who has lived through global upheavals, I’ve seen the cost when a nation abandons its moral bearings. I have walked through parishes where immigrant families seek refuge and dignity. I have prayed for leaders to have wisdom and compassion. These cardinals’ words echo that longing.

Their statement arrives at a time when many Americans indeed, many Catholics are wrestling with how to balance patriotism with fidelity to Gospel values. I’m struck by how rarely our religious leaders step into the public square with such clarity. They aren’t telling us whom to vote for, they are reminding us how to think about the world through the lens of our faith.

On Politics and Approval

In the current political climate, President Trump’s approval numbers reflect deep divisions in how Americans see our country’s direction. On issues like foreign policy and immigration-  the very topics raised by the cardinals, American voters show significant unease with the status quo. 

Some may wonder if this moral admonition will swing public opinion. Perhaps on its own it won’t move the needle dramatically. But moral leadership doesn’t show up in poll spikes, it shows up in conversation, conscience, and community. The Church’s voice reminds us that the measure of a society isn’t just economic growth or military strength, but how we love our neighbor.

Looking Ahead

As Catholics, we are called to be both faithful and engaged, to bring the light of Christ into every corner of public life. Whether you find yourself in agreement with the cardinals or wrestling with their points, I invite you to reflect prayerfully, discuss respectfully, and act consistently with your faith.

The future of our country and the moral health of our society depends not just on one election, one administration, or one set of policies. It depends on the moral choices of each of us, every day.

On January 19, 2026, three prominent U.S. Catholic cardinals, Blase Cupich (Chicago), Robert McElroy (Washington), and Joseph Tobin (Newark) issued a rare and unusually explicit statement urging the Trump administration to reorient U.S. foreign policy around moral principles rather than partisan or economic goals. They cited issues such as:

  • U.S. military engagement in places like Venezuela

  • Threats related to Greenland

  • Cuts to foreign aid and humanitarian programs

  • The need to protect human dignity, life, and religious liberty globally
    They said the nation risks polarization and moral drift if these aren’t addressed. 

Although the statement didn’t name President Trump directly, it was clearly aimed at his administration’s foreign policy direction and reflected Catholic moral teachings on peace, human dignity, and the common good. 

This follows earlier actions by the broader U.S. Catholic hierarchy, including US bishops’ recent rebukes of immigration enforcement policies perceived as dehumanizing. 

Approval Ratings Context

Current U.S. polling data (January 2026) shows President Trump’s overall approval rating around 40–43%, with disapproval above 55% still underwater on key issues like foreign policy and immigration

Here’s how the Catholic clergy’s rebukes might factor in:

  • Limited direct impact on overall approval - Most polling shows Trump’s base remains loyal even as broader disapproval persists, particularly among independents and moderates. 

  • Religious leadership criticism could resonate more among Catholic and moderate voters who don’t view Trump through a strictly partisan lens. Popes and bishops often have moral authority that transcends political identity. 

  • On some cultural issues (e.g., immigration), there already appears to be discontent among large majorities of voters, meaning the cardinals’ moral framing could influence views if it catches public attention

In short: the cardinals’ statement reinforces concerns many voters already have, but it is not by itself likely to drastically shift national polling numbers, unless it helps catalyze broader public debate or align Catholic voters behind alternatives. It could influence especially Catholic and ethical-issue voters ahead of elections. 

Finally, Here are the Key Points from Pope Leo XIV’s Jan. 9, 2026 Address related to the Concerns of the Three Cardinals Mention above.  

Pope Leo XIV delivered a forceful foreign-policy speech to ambassadors accredited to the Holy See. His address served as a moral “state of the world” outline that undergirds the U.S. cardinals’ statement. Here are the central themes: 

1️⃣ War and Diplomacy

  • The Pope warned that “war is back in vogue” and that the global community is increasingly reverting to military solutions rather than diplomatic dialogue. 

  • He lamented that post-World War II prohibitions on territorial aggression are being ignored and that peace is too often sought “through weapons” rather than negotiation. 

2️⃣ Human Rights & Human Dignity

  • Leo spoke of a “growing disregard for human life,” highlighting threats to basic human rights, including restrictions on religious freedom and freedom of speech in many parts of the world. 

  • He reiterated that respect for human life, from conception onward, is the foundation of all human rights, framing this as a moral imperative for nations and for international law. 

3️⃣ Weakening Multilateralism

  • The Pope criticized the erosion of international cooperation multilateral institutions and diplomacy in favor of power politics and unilateral action. 

4️⃣ Humanitarian Concern

  • He appealed for richer nations to uphold humanitarian aid and support for vulnerable populations, warning that cuts to such programs betray human dignity and Catholic teaching. 

 How These Points Connect to the Cardinals’ Concerns

The three U.S. cardinals Cupich, McElroy, and Tobin directly cited the Pope’s January address as the moral foundation for their criticism of current U.S. foreign policy. Here’s the link, point-by-point: 

✦ 1. War as a Last Resort

  • Pope Leo’s warning about “war… back in vogue” helped shape the cardinals’ call to renounce war as a normal instrument of national policy. They argue echoing the Pope that military action should only be a last resort, not a primary strategy

✦ 2. Respect for Human Life

  • The cardinals drew on the Pope’s emphasis that protection of life is the foundation of human rights, urging a U.S. foreign policy that upholds life and dignity globally not just in rhetoric but in practice. 

✦ 3. Diplomacy Over Force

  • The Pope’s critique of weakened multilateral diplomacy underlies the cardinals’ concern that the U.S. is too quick to resort to forceful or unilateral measures (e.g., in Venezuela or other foreign engagements). 

✦ 4. Humanitarian Aid

  • Citing the Pope’s appeal for humanitarian responsibility, the cardinals condemned reductions in foreign aid and urged support for the world’s vulnerable, a response directly rooted in Leo’s moral framework. 

🧭 In Summary

Pope Leo XIV’s address offered a moral template for international relations built on peace, respect for human dignity, multilateral dialogue, and humanitarian commitment. The three American cardinals explicitly used that template to evaluate U.S. foreign policy, saying it falls short of these principles and urging a reorientation grounded in Catholic teaching. 

My Reel of the Day- Trump Give-Up Greenland

https://www.facebook.com/reel/1428563248796091

No comments:

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...