The Sinking Philippines Pesos

Rescuing the sinking peso. Philippine Daily Inquirer / 05:35 AM January 12, 2026

The Philippine peso plunged to its weakest level of 59.355 against the United States dollar last Jan. 7, no thanks to the perfect storm of weak consumer and investor sentiment locally as a direct result of the widening corruption scandal and rising geopolitical risks abroad that have frozen investors on the sidelines.

Analysts and economists believe that given these factors that will cast a pall of lingering gloom on the country, the peso is on track to further depreciate to the 60-levels.

This further clouds the economic growth outlook for this make-or-break year for the Marcos administration, which is running against time to establish a positive legacy before the Philippines gets caught up in the frenzy ahead of the 2028 national elections.

A weak peso impacts the Philippines in different ways, although mostly negative in the current context.

Meanwhile, 

A new animal study has found that 59 non-human primate species engage in same-sex activity. The primates in question include bonobos, chimpanzees and macaques.

The study was published in the journal Nature Ecology & Evolution on 12 January, and is notable for being the most comprehensive review of non-human primate same-sex behaviour to date.

Study author Vincent Savolainen said: “What we found shows that same-sex is not like something bizarre, aberrant or rare. It’s everywhere, it’s very useful, it’s very important.”

For the study, 491 primate species were reviewed in terms of male-male and female-female interactions, which “predominantly involved mounting, ventral-ventral or ventral-dorsal, as well as genital touching and fellatio”.

It was found that same-sex behavior was more common when animals were subjected to harsh environmental conditions, were at risk of being eaten or when competition for resources was higher, and the species needed social cohesion to survive.

https://chateaudumer.blogspot.com/2026/01/what-sheep-can-teach-us-about-human.html

Lastly, Another Review from The Top TV Show of 2025:

“Heated Rivalry” might be a sign that audiences still have an appetite for sex scenes—when they actually serve a purpose, Faith Hill writes: https://theatln.tc/Fv0ZpdfY

The show follows rival hockey stars: Shane Hollander and Ilya Rozanov. “They’re supposed to hate each other—but then they start secretly sleeping together, which gets in the way of the animosity a bit,” Hill continues.

“‘Heated Rivalry’ has become an absolute phenomenon,” Hill writes. “People kept telling me that it was fun, sweet, and addicting. Most of all, they emphasized that it was really smutty.” But “Heated Rivalry” “knows the value of good sex scenes—not for thrills or laughs or snapshots of a fleeting moment but for illustrating how the characters’ relationship develops, touch by touch, over time. It takes sex seriously in an era when few shows do.”

“When I first started watching, I was surprised to find that it wasn’t explicit in quite the way I’d imagined,” Hill writes. There’s no full-frontal nudity, though one does glimpse a generous amount of butt cheek. “What feels unique about ‘Heated Rivalry,’ rather, is that it lets its sex scenes play out, sometimes sticking with its characters nearly from the beginning of their encounter until the end in real time. Even without showing everything, the series communicates the nitty-gritty of what’s going on: which acts, how long they take, who’s leading whom, whether the lovers are gentle or giggly or a little combative and when that tone subtly shifts.”

“A frank sex scene can provide a wealth of information about two characters and the dynamics between them,” Hill continues. Ilya and Shane don’t see each other frequently during their yearslong affair, and a lot about their relationship changes with each hook up. “If the viewer knew only that sex happened on these occasions, they’d be missing so much of what’s unfolded between Shane and Ilya—especially because these men are extremely bad at talking openly about their situation.”

Some surveys have shown that audiences have little appetite for sex scenes, yet “perhaps ‘Heated Rivalry’ is a sign that many people are game for sexy content when it’s done creatively or thoughtfully,” Hill continues.

: The Atlantic. Source: Sabrina Lantos / HBO Max.

My Reel of the Day:

https://fb.watch/ECj3lhJF-J/

Lastly, the the top five news of the Day:

1. U.S. Justice Department probes Minnesota officials

A notable new investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice targets Minnesota public officials amid protests and clashes with federal agents, marking a significant escalation in federal oversight. 

2. Federal judge limits ICE in Minneapolis protests

A federal judge has restricted ICE and federal law enforcement from using force against peaceful demonstrators in Minneapolis as unrest continues over a fatal police shooting. 

3. Uganda opposition leader reportedly abducted

Uganda’s army denies abducting opposition presidential candidate Bobi Wine, despite reports he was taken by helicopter following contested elections — a flashpoint in the country’s political crisis. 

4. U.S.–Venezuela talks reportedly began before raid

Reuters reports that U.S. diplomatic talks with Venezuela’s hardline minister Diosdado Cabello began months prior to a recent raid, shedding light on behind-the-scenes negotiations. 

5. AI platform X still allowing sexualized AI images

Despite announced restrictions, X (formerly Twitter) continues to allow users to post sexualized AI-generated images — raising ongoing concerns about content moderation. 

Disconnected in A Hyper-Connected World

Disconnected in a Hyper-Connected World

I watched Fareed Zakaria’s previous GPS special, “Disconnected: Life in a Disruptive Digital Age,” with great interest and more than a little unease.

Social connection is one of the most basic human needs. Long before food delivery apps or social media feeds, we survived because we gathered, talked, touched, and listened. And yet, in one of the most technologically connected eras in human history, something essential is slipping away.

We see it in the data: declining marriage rates, fewer close friendships, rising loneliness, especially among the young, but not only the young. Older adults feel it too, sometimes even more acutely. Loneliness has become a quiet epidemic, one that doesn’t announce itself with sirens but with silence.

Fareed’s program asks an uncomfortable but necessary question: What role are our digital devices playing in this unraveling of human connection?

Jonathan Haidt, social psychologist and author of The Anxious Generation, speaks powerfully about children and adolescents growing up in a world mediated by screens. Childhood, once filled with face-to-face play, small risks, and real-world problem solving, has been replaced by digital immersion and constant comparison. Anxiety and depression are not incidental side effects; they are increasingly the norm. As someone who has watched generations rise and mature, I found this deeply troubling. We are experimenting on children without fully understanding the long-term cost.

Robert D. Putnam, whose book Bowling Alone warned us decades ago about the erosion of civic life, joins Jean M. Twenge, author of 10 Rules for Raising Kids in a High-Tech World, to explore loneliness more broadly. Their message is sobering: community doesn’t disappear overnight, it thins out slowly. Fewer shared meals. Fewer clubs. Fewer unplanned conversations. Technology promises connection but often delivers isolation, especially when it replaces rather than supplements real human presence.

One of the most striking segments comes from Alice Evans, who studies what she calls the great gender divergence. Digital technology, she explains, is quietly pulling men and women onto different paths, different habits, different expectations, even different emotional languages. This widening gap affects relationships, families, and ultimately the social fabric itself. It helps explain why many young people feel disconnected not only from institutions, but from one another.

As an older reader and writer, I cannot help but reflect on how different things once were. We wrote letters and waited for replies. We showed up unannounced. We argued face to face and made up the same way. Time moved slower, yes but relationships were often deeper, rooted in presence rather than performance.

This is not a call to reject technology. I am writing these words using it, and many of us rely on digital tools for work, health, and staying in touch across continents. But GPS reminds us that technology is not neutral. It shapes habits, attention, and ultimately values. The question is not whether we use screens, but how and at what cost.

Perhaps the task before us, especially for those of us who have lived long enough to remember life before the algorithm, is to model something different. To choose conversation over scrolling. To value silence as much as stimulation. To remind younger generations that friendship, love, and community require time, patience, and physical presence.

Progress should not mean disconnection.

In the end, Fareed’s special felt less like a diagnosis and more like a warning and an invitation. An invitation to reclaim what makes us human, before we forget how to be together at all.

A Gentle Benediction

As we move forward in this fast and fractured age, may we remember what we already know in our bones: that a life well lived is measured not by notifications, but by relationships. May we continue to reach out, by voice, by hand, by presence while we still can. May we offer our patience to the young, our wisdom to the restless, and our listening hearts to one another. And may we never forget that even in a digital world, it is human connection that gives life its deepest meaning.

Meanwhile, here's the AI Overview on the Above Topic:

Feeling disconnected in a hyper-connected world stems from shallow digital interactions replacing deep human connection, leading to anxiety, loneliness, and burnout despite constant online access, but solutions involve intentional unplugging, setting boundaries (tech-free zones/times), pursuing offline hobbies, practicing mindfulness, and fostering vulnerability for authentic relationships, not just performance. It's about balancing technology use with real-life presence to find meaning and combat the "loneliness epidemic" in the digital age, notes sources like this Medium article and this Vocal Media article. 

Why We Feel Disconnected

• Shallow Connections: Social media offers quantity over quality, creating a false sense of connection.
• Performance vs. Presence: Curated online lives foster comparison, anxiety, and a focus on performance rather than authentic self-expression.
• Mental Fatigue: Constant notifications and digital multitasking fragment attention, impacting deep work and empathy.
• Loss of Self: Over-reliance on digital versions of life can disconnect us from our authentic selves and the present moment. 

Solutions: Reconnecting Authentically

• Create Tech-Free Spaces: Designate rooms (like bedrooms) or times (meals) as screen-free to encourage real interaction.
• Practice Digital Detoxes: Take regular breaks from all screens to immerse in nature or quiet reflection.
• Prioritize Offline Activities: Engage in hobbies, exercise, or community events that don't involve screens.
• Be Mindful: Turn off notifications and use "Do Not Disturb" to control interruptions and foster focus.
• Cultivate Vulnerability: Dare to express needs and emotions honestly in conversations, breaking the mold of superficial online interactions.
• Nurture Real Relationships: Make time for face-to-face conversations, listen deeply, and show up for people. 

The Goal: Mindful Integration, Not Rejection 

The aim isn't to ditch technology entirely, but to use it wisely, prioritizing genuine human connection, emotional depth, and self-awareness over endless scrolling and curated performances, leading to a more meaningful, grounded life. 

Finally, My Photo of the Day:

Mt. Rainier created a masterpiece the morning of 12-29-25.

A vertical pillar of light erupted from behind the silhouette, glowing like a beacon while the rest of the world stayed dark. It looked less like a sunset and more like a signal.

No digital art. No special effects. Just the freezing atmosphere, the perfect angle, and the mountain. Some views aren't just beautiful… they are powerful.

Lastly, the top five News of the Day:

🗞️ 1) New Poll on President Trump’s Second Term

A new AP-NORC poll shows many of President Donald Trump’s supporters feel his performance on the economy and key issues hasn’t met expectations nearly a year into his second term. The findings highlight divisions within his base ahead of the 2026 election cycle. 

🌍 2) U.S. Intelligence Engagement in Venezuela

CIA Director William Barron meets Venezuela’s interim leader in Caracas, marking a significant diplomatic step amid political instability in the country. It’s the highest-level U.S. official visit since major leadership shifts in Venezuela. 

🇮🇷 3) Iran Protests Subside After Crackdown

After a deadly government crackdown, protests in Iran have largely been quelled, according to residents and rights groups—though tensions and restrictions remain in force. 

📉 4) Global Economic & Policy Shifts

In the U.K., the Bank of England governor warned against rising populism, water services were restored after outages, and TikTok rolled out EU-wide age verification. Broader economic concerns persist, including housing markets and corporate forecasts. 

⚖️ 5) U.S. Judge Rules Against Trump Cabinet

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration Cabinet officials violated constitutional free-speech protections, a major legal blow with potential implications for executive conduct and civil liberties debates.

Greenland, Power and What's Beneath the Ice

Greenland, Power, and the Question Beneath the Ice

Every few years, an idea resurfaces that seems at first absurd, then unsettling, and finally revealing. Donald Trump’s renewed talk, direct or indirect, about acquiring Greenland falls squarely into that category.

On the surface, the arguments are strategic and rational. Greenland sits astride the Arctic, a region that is no longer a frozen afterthought but a frontline of 21st-century geopolitics. As polar ice melts, new shipping lanes open. Beneath the ice lie rare earth minerals, oil, gas, and resources critical to modern technologies, from EV batteries to military hardware. China and Russia both understand this. So does the Pentagon. From this perspective, Greenland is not a vanity project; it is a chess square.

But geopolitics is never just about maps and minerals. It is also about psychology, identity, and power.

The Strategic Case: Arctic Reality, Not Fantasy

The Arctic is heating up, literally and politically. The U.S. already maintains a military presence in Greenland through Thule Space Base, vital for missile defense and space surveillance. Control, or at least unquestioned influence, over Greenland would give Washington a commanding position in the High North, countering Russian Arctic militarization and China’s self-declared status as a “near-Arctic power.”

Minerals matter too. Rare earth supply chains are increasingly weaponized. Greenland’s untapped reserves are attractive to any nation seeking independence from Chinese dominance in this sector. From a purely strategic lens, interest in Greenland is neither new nor irrational. The U.S. considered buying it in 1867, 1910, and 1946, long before Trump.

The Ego Case: When Power Becomes Personal

And yet, context matters. Trump is not a conventional strategist. His worldview often reduces complex alliances to transactions and centuries-old institutions to balance sheets. In that light, Greenland risks becoming less a strategic asset and more a symbol: proof of dominance, deal-making prowess, and historical legacy.

Empires throughout history have confused acquisition with achievement. Land becomes a proxy for greatness. The danger is not ambition, it is simplification. When leaders frame geopolitics as real estate deals, they ignore the human, legal, and moral dimensions that bind the modern world together.

Greenland is not empty land. It is home to an Indigenous population with its own identity, aspirations, and increasing push for autonomy. Any discussion that treats it as a prize rather than a people echoes an older, darker era of colonial thinking.

NATO: The Silent Fault Line

Perhaps the most alarming thread in these discussions is the casual mention of NATO’s potential unraveling. Denmark, which governs Greenland, is a NATO ally. Any coercive attempt, economic, political, or otherwise to force a transfer of sovereignty would fracture the alliance at its core.

NATO is not just a military pact; it is a trust agreement. It works because members believe threats will come from outside, not within. If that trust erodes, NATO doesn’t need to be formally abolished, it simply becomes irrelevant.

For Europe, the message would be chilling: alliances are conditional, sovereignty negotiable, and security transactional. For the rest of the world, it would confirm a shift from rules-based order to raw power politics.

What This Moment Really Reveals

Whether Trump’s Greenland talk is serious policy, negotiating theater, or rhetorical provocation almost misses the point. What matters is what it reveals about the current global moment.

We are living through a return of 19th-century instincts in a 21st-century world. Strongmen think in terms of territory. Democracies struggle with consensus. Institutions built after World War II feel fragile under pressure from nationalism, climate change, and technological disruption. Greenland, in this sense, is not the story. It is the mirror.

A Final Thought

As a blogger who has watched empires strain, narratives collapse, and power shift over decades, I am less interested in whether Greenland is “taken” than in what such conversations normalize. When sovereignty becomes negotiable and alliances optional, stability gives way to spectacle.

The ice is melting in the Arctic. The real question is whether the moral ice beneath global order is melting too. And once that melts, no one truly controls what comes next.

Meanwhile, here's the AI Overview on the Above Topic

Greenland

 has emerged as a central flashpoint in global "power politics," driven by the receding ice sheet which is revealing vast mineral wealth and strategic opportunities. The "question beneath the ice" refers to whether these newly accessible resources will foster a green energy revolution or trigger a dangerous new era of great-power conflict. 

The Quest for Power and Resources

• Critical Minerals: Beneath the ice lies approximately 18% of the world's rare earth reserves, including neodymium and dysprosium, which are essential for electric vehicles and military hardware. Greenland also contains 25 of the 34 minerals deemed "critical raw materials" by the European Commission, such as cobalt, lithium, and copper.
• Geopolitics of Supply: Western nations are increasingly viewing Greenland as a way to break China's dominance in the rare earth market. As of early 2026, roughly 40 mining companies are actively exploring the island.
• Strategic Shipping: Melting ice is opening new Arctic shipping lanes that could dramatically shorten global trade routes between North America, Europe, and Asia, turning Greenland into a geoeconomic chokepoint. 

Recent Political Tensions (January 2026)

• U.S. Territorial Ambitions: In January 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump has renewed his interest in Greenland, suggesting that the U.S. must have "ownership" rather than just a lease for military bases. This has triggered a diplomatic crisis with Denmark and Greenland's local government.
• NATO at Risk: Experts warn that aggressive U.S. attempts to annex Greenland could threaten the stability of the NATO alliance, as Greenland remains a part of Denmark and its defense.
• Local Resistance: Greenland's Prime Minister Múte Egede and Danish officials have firmly rejected these proposals, stating that "Greenland is not for sale" and that decisions concerning the island must be made by its citizens. 

The "Question" of Preservation vs. Profit

• The Climate Paradox: While Greenland's minerals are needed for the green energy transition, the process of mining them poses severe environmental risks to a fragile ecosystem warming four times faster than the global average.
• Hidden Legacies: Recent scientific missions, such as GreenDrill, are uncovering ancient life and Cold War secrets beneath the ice, including Camp Century, a "city under the ice" that once housed a portable nuclear power plant and now serves as a reminder of the island's long-standing military value.
• The Sea Level Threat: Scientists emphasize that Greenland's most significant "value" may be its ice remaining frozen; its total melt would cause a global sea-level rise of approximately 24 feet (7.4 meters). 

My Reel of the Day: Greenland and Denmark

https://www.facebook.com/reel/2263443450800941

News of the Day:

Troops from Denmark, Germany, France, Sweden, and Finland have now arrived in Greenland as part of a coordinated effort to strengthen security in the strategically important Arctic region. Denmark, which holds responsibility for Greenland’s defense, has expanded military patrols and hosted allied forces for joint exercises and surveillance missions under NATO cooperation. The deployments come amid rising geopolitical tensions in the High North, where melting ice is opening new sea routes and increasing global competition. European leaders have stressed that Greenland’s security and future are determined solely by Denmark and Greenland, rejecting any external pressure or unilateral claims. The arrival of these multinational forces signals a unified European commitment to deterrence, stability, and long-term security in the Arctic.